Jamie Mckenzie, Editor, FromNowOn and Terrie Gray, Director, ED's Oasis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alignment |
No evidence of relationship to target curriculum; no reference to facts and properly documented resources. Users are not likely to learn from this product. |
Some evidence of connection to target curriculum; a few references to facts and properly documented resources. Users find it difficult to learn from this product. |
Adequate evidence of connection to target curriculum; clear references to facts and properly documented resources. Users can learn from this product. |
Clear evidence of connection to target curriculum; frequent references to facts and properly documented resources. Users are likely to learn from this product. |
|
Content |
No logical sequence of information; menus and paths to information are not evident. |
Some logical sequence of information, but menus and paths are confusing or flawed. |
Logical sequence of information. Menus and paths to more information are clear and direct. |
Logical, intuitive sequence of information. Menus and paths to all information are clear and direct. |
|
|
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. |
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. |
The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images and inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. |
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. |
|
|
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect or flawed. |
Some subject knowledge is evident. Some information is confusing, incorrect or flawed. |
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the product. Information is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
Subject knowledge is evident throughout. (more than required) All information is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
|
|
Exaggerated emphasis upon graphics and special effects weakens the message and interferes with the communication of content and ideas. |
Graphical and multimedia elements accompany content but there is little sign of mutual reinforcement. There is no attention paid to visual design criteria such as balance, proportion, harmony and restraint. There is some tendency toward random use of graphical elements. |
Design elements and content combine effectively to deliver a high impact message with the graphics and the words reinforcing each other. |
The combination of multimedia elements with words and ideas takes communication and persuasion to a very high level, superior to what could be accomplished with either alone. The mixture brings about synergy and dramatic effects which reach the intended audience with style, pizzazz and elegance. |
|
|
Presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has three or more misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has fewer than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
|
|
Screens are either confusing and cluttered or barren and stark. Buttons or navigational tools are absent or confusing. |
Screens are difficult to navigate, but some buttons and navigational tools work. Users can navigate a few screens. |
Screens contain adequate navigational tools and buttons. Users can progress through screens in a logical path to find information. |
Screens contain all necessary navigational tools and buttons. Users can progress intuitively through screens in a logical path to find information. |